I live in the other end of Ontario. I have two questions. LOL I am the respondent in a family law case. I had hired a lawyer who does estates, real-estate and family law. I expected a straight forward sep/dev. All affidavits submitted by applicant contain two false statements I am aware of. 1 claim of charge account to exist on valuation date I 100% know came into effect well after that date. 2 Claim of quality of relationship for a child from applicant's previous marriage though clinical docs exist under private firm pertaining to family clinician involvement to resolve issues about "lack of relationship with same child". I made my lawyer aware of both issues and provided name and number of clinical rec coordinator. CC occurs no mention either statement. he down plays after that. I caved on the issue of relationship due to app's controlling of access to my daughter and mounting financial problems for the first time in my life. I did send a letter of concern to my lawyer stating the obvious and only response was a bill for 10 minutes legal assistant time for forwarding my email. I knew then I could not trust the person but could trust the license. I stopped giving him my money. The SC occurs almost 365 days to the day of application. I was surprised that another adjournment occurred as 6 filled in the rest of the time since the CC. But was not surprised to hear SCJ state app's SCB not in front of her. After 18 years of being a psychiatric nurse you realize body language much more accurate that content of speech. And the app's lawyer speech was one of extreme duress . The blame fell on the people downstairs. My rep minimized my long list of issues to he expects some credit for mortgage payments made while living in Mat home but separated. My list of payment's much longer and contain payments from time living in mat home and being forced out. When I say forced out I mean being goaded into acting out and just laughing at the app instead. This is much more effective, but when kids around I just ignored her behaviors. As her tactics became much more cutting and myself having no effective outlet I had to leave. Back support to six months prior to move out. Credits accumulated about 40k And of course app's lawyer disputes this despite extensive bank records to prove payments. SCJ states go back to office and continue to negotiate, I could not speak as I could not trust myself and self control taxed. I took time attending meeting 4 hours same BS I walked out.
I apologize for length and still have left out so much that involves other licenses and I am sure they do not fully grasp what it is they are doing for the app's lawyer or just don't care. I did approach police several times eventually receive Occ. number but when arriving to give statement police refused go see JP
No I am laying information to JP and hopefully crown. Would fraudulent representation fit here. Are these conferences considered judicial hearings leaning towards misleading superior court justice by both Lawyers. I know failing in their duty as a officer of the court but that is not very specific and would likely result in menial punitive measures from UCLS. Breach of contract is obvious, but again would likely allow them to retain their license. I am seeking restitution and hopefully punitive damages. I never have been a person to seek such, but now I am. The reason I would like licenses revoked is prevent the possibility of a future client from loosing their self control and making a mistake. This could easily happen when you play that way with people who are vulnerable. Any insight would be appreciated as lawyers around here get really quiet for some reason when I ask them. Thanks again